Slide Presentation

TITLE    (click title to view slides)

AUTHOR
Lynn M Sosnoskie and Stanley Culpepper
Professor and Extension Weed Specialist
University of Georgia

DOWNLOAD PRESENTATION    (right click and select 'Save Target As...')

TABLE OF CONTENTS
  1. 2012: Changes in Cotton Weed Management Practices in Georgia Following the Development of Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth
  2. Distribution of GR Palmer amaranth
  3. Cotton producing regions in US
  4. Glyphosate-resistant cotton: Changes in weed management
  5. Glyphosate-resistant cotton: Changes in weed management
  6. Objective
  7. Survey development and administration
  8. Survey development and administration
  9. Survey development and administration
  10. County Data- 2009 Georgia Farm Gate Value Report (AR-10-01)
  11. Row, Forage, Fruit & Nut Farm Gate Value
  12. Total grower and county agent acres
  13. Commodities - example
  14. Commodity composition of growers' farms
  15. Herbicides - example
  16. Herbicides - example
  17. Growers: Pre-plant herbicides applied- Percent (%) of acres treated
  18. Agents: Pre-plant herbicides applied- Percent (%) of acres treated
  19. Growers: Pre-plant/PRE herbicides applied- Percent (%) of acres treated
  20. Agents: Pre-plant/PRE herbicides applied- Percent (%) of acres treated
  21. PPI herbicides applied- Percent (%) of acres treated
  22. Growers: POST herbicides applied- Percent (%) of acres treated
  23. Agents: POST herbicides applied- Percent (%) of acres treated
  24. Growers: PD herbicides applied- Percent (%) of acres treated
  25. Agents: PD herbicides applied- Percent (%) of acres treated
  26. Growers: Changes in glyphosate and glufosinate applications from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010
  27. Agents: Changes in glyphosate and glufosinate applications from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010
  28. Growers: Changes in herbicide costs from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010
  29. Agents: Changes in herbicide costs from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010
  30. Additional practices - example
  31. Growers: Changes in hand-weeding from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010
  32. Agents: Changes in hand-weeding from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010
  33. Growers: Changes in tillage/planting practices from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010
  34. Agents: Changes in tillage/planting practices from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010
  35. Changes in In-row cultivation from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010
  36. Growers: Most troublesome weed
  37. Growers: 2nd Most troublesome weed
  38. Agents: Most troublesome weed
  39. Agents: 2nd Most troublesome weed



SLIDE CONTENTS
  1. 2012: Changes in Cotton Weed Management Practices in Georgia Following the Development of Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth Lynn M. Sosnoskie1,2 and A. Stanley Culpepper1 1University of Georgia - Tifton 2University of California - Davis
  2. Distribution of GR Palmer amaranth Map credit: R. L. Nichols
  3. Cotton producing regions in US Map credit: http://www.cottonusa.org/
  4. Glyphosate-resistant cotton: Changes in weed management Shaner (2000) Pest Manage. Sci. 56:320-326. Glyphosate use increasing in cotton Concomitant decrease in: PS II inhibitors – diuron, fluometuron, prometryn DNAs – pendimethalin, trifluralin Arsenates – MSMA Carotenoid biosynthesis inhibitors - clomazone
  5. Glyphosate-resistant cotton: Changes in weed management Young (2006) Weed Technol. 20:301-307. Increase in glyphosate applications: 1/crop (1996) to 1.8/crop (2001) Decreased use of fluometuron and trifluralin: Fluometuron - 27-44% (1992-1998) to 20-27% (1999-2001) Trifluralin – 52-67% (1992-1999) to 30-39% (2000-2001) Glyphosate – 30-36% (1998-1999) to 56-57% (2000-2001)
  6. Objective: To determine if cotton weed management practices in Georgia have changed following the development of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth
  7. Survey development and administration Two surveys (growers and extension agents) Surveys were designed by the authors and reviewed by an expert committee consisting of: extension agents, University (UGA and other) research scientists, UGA rural sociologist, industry personnel Surveys were ‘identical’ except for the fact that the growers were asked (anonymously) about their individual farming practices and agents provided 3rd party information about county-wide activities
  8. Survey development and administration Final survey was 8 pages long, contained 19 questions, and was administered in person Survey sections: Commodities/acreage Herbicide use Additional weed management practices Tillage, cultivation, hand-weeding Weed problems Including the presence and severity of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth BEFORE 2000-2005 AFTER 2006-2010
  9. Survey development and administration E-mail was sent to all Georgia extension agents with cotton responsibilities (2010) describing the survey and requesting that they and 3-5 ‘representative’ growers in their county participate in the process Grower qualifications: Cotton production Responsible for making (agricultural) decisions on their property Did not work for a chemical manufacturer, distributor, of retailer, nor a seed company
  10. County Data 2009 Georgia Farm Gate Value Report (AR-10-01) * Extension agent from Colquitt County also returned a survey (54,010 acres, $42.1 Million, Rank = 2).
  11. Total grower (n = 65) acres = 129,615 (12.6% of GA cotton) Total agent county (n = 10) acres = 246,034 (24% of GA cotton)
  12. Commodities - example Grower Question 4: How many acres do you farm?____________________ Grower Question 5: What types of agricultural commodity groups do you produce on your farm? Yes No Approximate number of acres or number of heads, houses or ponds Row and forage crops ___ ___ _____________________ Poultry and eggs ___ ___ _____________________ Livestock and aquaculture ___ ___ _____________________ Forestry products ___ ___ _____________________ Vegetables ___ ___ _____________________ Ornamental horticulture ___ ___ _____________________ Other (Please describe) (Continued on next page)
  13. Commodity composition of growers' farms
  14. Herbicides - example Grower Question 9: What herbicides have you relied on for weed control in cotton before (2000-2005) and after (2006-2010) the development of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (pigweed)? On what percent of you row crop acreage have you used each product? PREPLANT and PREEMERGENCE (burndown (including early), applications made at or prior to planting, and applications made prior to cotton emergence): Before (2000-2005): After (2006-2010): Yes No Average % of Acres Yes No Average % of Acres Roundup, Glyphomax, Touchdown, others ___ ___ _________________ ___ ___ _________________ 2,4-D ___ ___ _________________ ___ ___ _________________ Aim ___ ___ _________________ ___ ___ _________________ Clarity ___ ___ _________________ ___ ___ _________________ Valor SX ___ ___ _________________ ___ ___ _________________ Direx, others ___ ___ _________________ ___ ___ _________________ Firestorm, Parazone, Gramoxone Inteon ___ ___ _________________ ___ ___ _________________ (Continued on next page)
  15. Herbicides - example Herbicides are not divided up/grouped by MOA, activity, selectivity Grouped by timing of application as expressed in Georgia Pest Management handbook (http://www.ent.uga.edu/pmh/). 1. PREPLANT and PREEMERGENCE (burndown (including early), applications made at or prior to planting, and applications made prior to cotton emergence): 2. POSTEMERGENCE OVER-THE-TOP (following cotton emergence): 3. POSTEMERGENCE DIRECTED:
  16. Growers: Pre-plant herbicides applied Percent (%) of acres treated * * *
  17. Agents: Pre-plant herbicides applied Percent (%) of acres treated * * *
  18. Growers: Pre-plant*/PRE herbicides applied Percent (%) of acres treated * * * *
  19. Agents: Pre-plant*/PRE herbicides applied Percent (%) of acres treated * * * *
  20. PPI herbicides applied Percent (%) of acres treated GROWERS AGENTS *
  21. Growers: POST herbicides applied Percent (%) of acres treated * * *
  22. Agents: POST herbicides applied Percent (%) of acres treated * * *
  23. Growers: PD herbicides applied Percent (%) of acres treated * * *
  24. Agents: PD herbicides applied Percent (%) of acres treated * * * * *
  25. Growers: Changes in glyphosate and glufosinate applications from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010 *
  26. Agents: Changes in glyphosate and glufosinate applications from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010 *
  27. Growers 2000-2005: Herbicide costs = $32.30/A 2006-2010: Herbicide costs = $62.50/A
  28. Agents 2000-2005: Herbicide costs = $27.80/A 2006-2010: Herbicide costs = $68.00/A
  29. Additional practices - example Grower Question 13: Have you ever hand-weeded cotton due to insufficient chemical or mechanical weed control before (2000-2005) and after (2006-2010) the development of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (pigweed)? Before (2000-2005): After (2006-2010): Yes No Average % of Acres Yes No Average % of Acres ___ ___ ___________________ ___ ___ ___________________ Grower Question 14: Please estimate the cost of hand-weeding in cotton before (2000-2005) and after (2006-2010) the development of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (pigweed). Before (2000-2005): After (2006-2010): ____________________________$/Acre ___________________________$/Acre (Continued on next page)
  30. Photo by A.C. York 2010 2000-2005: 17% of growers hand-weeded 5% cotton acres at $2.40/A 2006-2010: 92% of growers hand-weeded 52% cotton acres at $23.70/A
  31. Photo by A.C. York 2010 2000-2005: According to agents, growers hand-weeded 3% cotton acres at $3.50/A 2006-2010: According to agents, growers hand-weeded 66% cotton acres at $21.70/A
  32. Growers: Changes in tillage/planting practices from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010
  33. Agents: Changes in tillage/planting practices from 2000-2005 to 2006-2010
  34. In-row cultivation Growers: 2000-2005: 34.3% of cotton acres cultivated 2006-2010: 43.9% of cotton acres cultivated Agents: 2000-2005: 13.1% of cotton acres cultivated 2006-2010: 32.1% of cotton acres cultivated
  35. Growers: Most troublesome weed* * Summed averages are greater than 100% because of multiple votes for most troublesome species/grower
  36. Growers: 2nd Most troublesome weed* * Summed averages are greater than 100% because of multiple votes for most troublesome species/grower
  37. Agents: Most troublesome weed
  38. Agents: 2nd Most troublesome weed