Slide Presentation

TITLE    (click title to view slides)

AUTHOR
Eric P. Prostko
Professor and Extension Weed Specialist
University of Georgia

DOWNLOAD PRESENTATION    (right click and select 'Save Target As...')

TABLE OF CONTENTS
  1. Tractor Speed and Boom Height Effects on Spray Coverage
  2. On-Farm vs. UGA Research?
  3. 2016 Peanut Weed Control Research
  4. 2016 Peanut Weed Control Research
  5. A Growers Peanut Field in 2016 Who Spent $138/A on Herbicides
  6. Is this a bad combination????
  7. Herbicide Efficacy
  8. 2015 Speed/Boom Height Test - UGA Ponder Farm
  9. Tractor Speed Effects on Spray Coverage (%) - 30" Boom Height - 15 GPA (2015)
  10. Objective
  11. Materials and Methods
  12. 2016 Nozzle Test
  13. 2016 Speed/Boom Height/Nozzle Test
  14. 2016 Nozzle Test
  15. The Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Spray Coverage (%) (15 GPA, 45 PSI, AI11004 and AI11006 nozzles)
  16. Figure 3. The Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Droplet Size (VMD50) (15 GPA, 45 PSI, AI11004 and AI11006 nozzles)
  17. TurboDrop® Asymmetrical Dual Fan (Greenleaf Technologies)
  18. Table 1. The Influence of Nozzle System on Spray Coverage and VMD50 – 2016.
  19. Summary - 2016
  20. Questions?



SLIDE CONTENTS
  1. Tractor Speed and Boom Height Effects on Spray Coverage Eric P. Prostko1, Glen C. Rains2, Justin Lanier3, Maryssa Davis2 1Dept. Crop & Soil Sciences, 2Dept. of Entomology 3Former Crisp County Extension Agent
  2. On-Farm vs. UGA Research? Concerns Tractor Speed Boom Height Coverage Quality vs. Quantity?
  3. 2016 Peanut Weed Control Research PE-08B-16 June 22, 2016 56 DAP
  4. 2016 Peanut Weed Control Research PE-08B-16 August 9, 2016 104 DAP
  5. A Growers Peanut Field in 2016 Who Spent $138/A on Herbicides August 24, 2016 + 0.3 oz/A Strongarm + 24 oz/A 2,4-DB $55/A for hand-weeding (2X) 5250 lb/A
  6. Is this a bad combination???? 6 ft
  7. Herbicide Efficacy Coverage Nozzle Type GPA Pressure Boom Height Tractor Speed Time of Day
  8. 10’ 30” 8’ 2015 Speed/Boom Height Test – UGA Ponder Farm
  9. Figure 1. Tractor Speed Effects on Spray Coverage (%) – 30” Boom Height – 15 GPA (2015) N = 30 8003DG (40 PSI) 8004DG (53 PSI)
  10. Objective Evaluate the effects of tractor speed and boom height on spray quality commercial sprayer Coverage VMD50
  11. Materials and Methods March 16, 2016 Crisp County Steve and Stewart Whelchel JD 4630 80’ boom 20” nozzle spacing Tractor Speeds 8.5 and 13.0 MPH Boom Heights 40 and 60 in 15 GPA (water + dye) AI11004VS + AI11006VS spray tips 45 PSI 30 Kromekote cards (2” X 3”) 7” X 10’ apart Dropletscan (WRK of Arkansas, LLC)
  12. 2016 Nozzle Test JD 4630 80’ Spray Boom 20” nozzle spacing
  13. 2016 Speed/Boom Height/Nozzle Test
  14. 2016 Nozzle Test
  15. Figure 2. The Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Spray Coverage (%) (15 GPA, 45 PSI, AI11004 and AI11006 nozzles) P = 0.4566 P = 0.9208 *averaged over 2 boom heights (40” and 60”) ** averaged over 2 tractor speeds (8.5 and 13.0 MPH)
  16. Figure 3. The Influence of Tractor Speed and Boom Height on Droplet Size (VMD50) (15 GPA, 45 PSI, AI11004 and AI11006 nozzles) LSD 0.10 = 3 P = 0.3107 *averaged over 2 boom heights (40” and 60“) ** averaged over 2 tractor speeds (8.5 and 13.0 MPH)
  17. TurboDrop® Asymmetrical Dual Fan (Greenleaf Technologies)
  18. Table 1. The Influence of Nozzle System on Spray Coverage and VMD50 – 2016.
  19. Summary - 2016 No interaction between speed and boom height No effect of speed or boom height on coverage (P > 0.45) VMD50 increased with speed but was not affected by boom height 2015 results different than 2016 results sprayer, nozzles, methodology
  20. Questions? eprostko@uga.edu www.gaweed.com