Slide Presentation
TITLE
(click title to view slides)
Peanut Response to Dicamba (Clarity)
AUTHOR
E.P. Prostko
, T.L. Grey, M. Marshall, J.A. Ferrell, D.L. Jordan, B.J. Brecke, P.A. Dotray, W.J.Grichar
DOWNLOAD PRESENTATION
(right click and select 'Save Target As...')
PowerPoint - 28.0 MB
PDF - 0.7 MB
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Peanut Response to Dicamba (Clarity)
2007 Contaminated 2,4-DB Symptomology
2007 Contaminated 2,4-DB
Dicamba-Resistant Crops
Dicamba Drift on Soybeans
Objectives
Materials and Methods
Site Descriptions
Results
Figure 1. Peanut Yield Response to Clarity, Ty Ty, GA (2008).
Figure 2. Peanut Yield Response to Clarity, Lamesa, TX (2008).
Figure 3. Peanut Yield Response to Clarity, Yoakum, TX (2008).
Figure 4. Peanut Yield Response to Clarity, Rocky Mount, NC (2008).
Figure 5. Peanut Yield Response to Clarity, Blackville, SC (2008).
Figure 6. Peanut Yield Response to Clarity Rate (2008). (pooled over 3 timings)
Figure 7. Peanut Yield As Influenced by Clarity Timing (2008). (pooled over 6 rates)
Peanut Response to Clarity (dicamba) 4SC @ 16 ozs/A
Peanut Response to Clarity (dicamba) 4SC @ 8 ozs/A
Peanut Response to Clarity (dicamba) 4SC @ 1 oz/A
Summary
For More Weed Science Info www.gaweed.com
SLIDE CONTENTS
Peanut Response to Dicamba (Clarity) E.P. Prostko, T.L. Grey, M. Marshall, J.A. Ferrell, D.L. Jordan, B.J. Brecke, P.A. Dotray, W.J. Grichar APRES 2009
2007 Contaminated 2,4-DB Symptomology
2007 Contaminated 2,4-DB (> 250 ppm or 0.025%)
Dicamba-Resistant Crops Behrens et al. 2007 Science 316:1185-1188. (Nebraska) Transferred gene from Pseudomonas maltophila into tobacco, soybeans, tomatoes Monsanto in hot pursuit dicamba acid dicamba DGA salt
Dicamba Drift on Soybeans 14-93% yield reduction (V3) Anderson et al. 2004 (SD) 15%-22% yield loss (V3); 12-28% yield loss (V7) Kelley et al. 2005 (IL)
Objectives Determine the influence of Clarity rate and timing of application on peanut yield Develop a predictive model for future use
Materials and Methods 8 locations across Peanut Belt GA(2), FL(2), SC(1), NC(1), TX (2), RCB design 3 X 6 factorial arrangement Timing (30, 60, 90 DAP) Rate (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 oz/A Clarity) 4 replications Weed-free
Site Descriptions
Results 5 locations had significant rate X timing interaction Lamesa, Yoakum, Rocky Mount, Blackville, and TyTy 3 locations had no interaction Plains, Jay, Citra Rate and timing were significant
Figure 1. Peanut Yield Response to Clarity, Ty Ty, GA (2008). LSD 0.10 = 472
Figure 2. Peanut Yield Response to Clarity, Lamesa, TX (2008). LSD 0.10 = 620
Figure 3. Peanut Yield Response to Clarity, Yoakum, TX (2008). LSD 0.10 = 210
Figure 4. Peanut Yield Response to Clarity, Rocky Mount, NC (2008). LSD 0.10 = 466
Figure 5. Peanut Yield Response to Clarity, Blackville, SC (2008). LSD 0.10 = 1208
Figure 6. Peanut Yield Response to Clarity Rate (2008). (pooled over 3 timings) Plains LSD 0.10 = 467 Jay LSD 0.10 = 599 Citra LSD 0.10 = 330
Figure 7. Peanut Yield As Influenced by Clarity Timing (2008). (pooled over 6 rates) Plains LSD 0.10 = 349 Jay LSD 0.10 = 422 Citra LSD 0.10 = 203
Peanut Response to Clarity (dicamba) 4SC @ 16 ozs/A Applied 30 DAP (664 lb/A – 87% loss) Applied 60 DAP (955 lb/A – 81% loss) Applied 90 DAP (2198 lb/A – 56% loss) Photo 107 DAP Ty Ty, GA NTC (4994 lb/A)
Peanut Response to Clarity (dicamba) 4SC @ 8 ozs/A Applied 30 DAP (1622 lb/A – 67% loss) Applied 60 DAP (1714 lb/A – 66% loss) Applied 90 DAP (3509 lb/A – 30% loss) Photo 107 DAP Ty Ty, GA NTC (4994 lb/A)
Peanut Response to Clarity (dicamba) 4SC @ 1 oz/A Applied 30 DAP (4481 lb/A – 10% loss) Applied 60 DAP (3841 lb/A – 33% loss) Applied 90 DAP (4891 lb/A – 2% loss) Photo 107 DAP Ty Ty, GA NTC (4994 lb/A)
Summary Increase Clarity rate = increase peanut yield loss Increase peanut age = decreased peanut yield loss Some locations (13/25) 60 DAP more sensitive (R3-R4 stage of growth) Can get significant peanut yield reductions with as little as 1 oz/A Clarity 13% average (0%-low, 25%-high) Growers need to avoid contamination/drift problems
For More Weed Science Info www.gaweed.com www.gaweed.com