Slide Presentation

TITLE    (click title to view slides)

AUTHOR
Nathan Smith
UGA Extension Economist

DOWNLOAD
• Slide Presentation (PowerPoint, 1.1 MB)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
  1. Farm Bill, Economics & Outlook for 2002
  2. Peanut Situation
  3. US Peanut Production, Quota, and Food Use
  4. Planted Acres by Region
  5. 2001 Peanut Crop
  6. U.S. Peanut Balance Sheet
  7. Estimated 2001/02 Peanut Supply and Disappearance
  8. Marketing Assessment
  9. What do I need from the Market? Irrigated Budgets
  10. What do I need from the Market? Dryland Budgets
  11. UGA CES Peanut Budgets, South Georgia 2002
  12. Method 1: Based On Producer Net Returns
  13. Net Return to Quota per lb for 3500 lb Irrigated Yield
  14. Net Return to Quota per lb for 2500 lb Non-Irrigated Yield
  15. Trade Situation
  16. Tariff Rates
  17. Tidal Wave May Be Closer Than Thought!
  18. Argentina
  19. Argentina Exchange Rate
  20. Recent Changes in Argentina’s Exchange Rate
  21. What if Exchange Rate continues to drop?
  22. Farm Bill Chronology and Timetable
  23. Major Components Of The Bill
  24. Marketing Loan
  25. Fixed, Decoupled Payments
  26. Counter-Cyclical Payments
  27. Counter-Cyclical Payment Calculation
  28. Comparison of House and Senate to Current Program
  29. Peanut Provision Basics
  30. Comparison of Payments @ 375/ton Peanuts
  31. Whole Farm Comparison of House and Senate Proposals
  32. FARMCATS
  33. A tool to help producers
  34. We Need Your Help
  35. UGA Peanut Team



SLIDE CONTENTS
  1. Farm Bill, Economics & Outlook for 2002 County Agent Peanut Training Nathan Smith UGA Extension Economist
  2. Peanut Situation Bumper crop in Southeast Over supply situation Domestic use down 3.3% from last year Exports down in 1st quarter Quota kept at 2001 level Argentina currency devaluation impact? Farm Bill in 2002 or 2003?
  3. US Peanut Production, Quota, and Food Use Effective Quota is Basic Quota plus Undermarketings 1990-95, and Basic Quota plus Buybacks 1996-00.
  4. Planted Acres by Region US SE GA SW VC
  5. 2001 Peanut Crop
  6. U.S. Peanut Balance Sheet million pounds (Dec 12, 2001)
  7. Estimated 2001/02 Peanut Supply and Disappearance
  8. Marketing Assessment GFA has approximately 243,000 tons of quota in loan Another 145,000 tons of additionals are in the loan pool 243,000 tons * $400 loss = 97.2 mil. Loss SE has ~ 692,000 tons quota Marketing assessment could be as much as $140/ton not counting additional losses or gains
  9. What do I need from the Market? Irrigated Budgets * 2002 UGA CES Cost of Production Budgets Note: Land and Quota costs not included
  10. What do I need from the Market? Dryland Budgets * 2002 UGA CES Cost of Production Budgets Note: Land and Quota costs not included
  11. UGA CES Peanut Budgets, South Georgia 2002
  12. Net Return to Quota per lb for 3500 lb Irrigated Yield
  13. Net Return to Quota per lb for 2500 lb Non-Irrigated Yield
  14. Trade Situation US is preparing for WTO negotiations FTAA has been stalled since the Sep. 11 attack Argentina facing a currency devaluation
  15. Tariff Rates # Tariff rates on a pound of shelled peanuts
  16. Tidal Wave May Be Closer Than Thought!
  17. Argentina Main exporter of peanuts into US Allocated 78% of the in-quota TRQ (Tariff Rate Quota) Amounted to 43.9 thousand metric tons last year Main competitor in the European Market Arg 43% market share from 98-00’ US 26% market share from 98-00’
  18. Argentina Exchange Rate Austral pegged to US dollar in 1991 Austral replaced by Peso in 1992 at a fixed rate of 1:1 to the US dollar Peso became overvalued by being tied to the US dollar May 2001 figures show 80-90% overvalued, reduces Argentina’s competitiveness in the world market
  19. Recent Changes in Argentina’s Exchange Rate New temporary official exchange rate of 1.4 Pesos/US $ Argentina price is estimated to still be above US price (57.5 cents/pound) with 131.8 tariff rate (using 34.8 cents/lb + 2 cents/lb shipping cost) Soon will be allowed to float freely (this summer)
  20. What if Exchange Rate continues to drop? The current free market exchange rate is closer to 1:1.6 At 60% devaluation, Argentina peanuts produced using >80% domestic inputs would be below the US price Would make the tariff rate quota meaningless as a protection measure
  21. Farm Bill Chronology and Timetable House Ag Committee presents HR 2646 -- July 27, 2001 HR2646 passed the House -- October 5, 2001 Senate Ag Committee passes S 1628 -- November 15, 2001 “Harkin Bill” presented S 1731 to the Senate -- November 27, 2001 Senate Adjourned December 21 without a vote Senate reconvenes next week Senate vote House-Senate conference committee President FSA must write regulations
  22. Major Components Of The Bill -- Provisions That Impact Income -- Loan Rate AMTA or Fixed, Decoupled Payments Base Target Price Payment Acres Payment Yield Payment Limits
  23. Marketing Loan Non-recourse Marketing Loan for all peanuts produced. LDP could be taken on peanuts instead of actually taking out a loan. Payment limitation of Marketing Loan gains and LDPs is proposed at $150,000 (House)
  24. Fixed, Decoupled Payments New name for AMTA payments. Peanuts would received a Fixed, Decoupled Payment of $36 per ton. “Historical Producer” is defined as having peanuts sometime during the 1998-2001 time period on a farm. Payment limitation: $50,000 (House) $100,000 combined with CCP (Senate)
  25. Counter-Cyclical Payments Establish a payment to producers with peanut base. Not tied to production Payments would be triggered when the average season price for peanuts falls below a target price. Payment limitation: $75,000 (House) $100,000 combined with FDP (Senate)
  26. Counter-Cyclical Payment Calculation CCP = TP - ASP - FDP or TP - NLR - FDP, whichever is higher. CCP = counter cyclical payment TP = target price, $480 ASP = average season price FDP = fixed, decoupled payment, $36 NLR = national loan rate, $350
  27. Impact: Will create major tension between some Georgia landowners/quota holders and producers. Will give the producer leverage for 180 days. Creates the opportunity for long term leases to be negotiated. Total bases of All crops cannot exceed cropland on the farm. Comparison of House and Senate To Current Program
  28. Peanut Provision Basics
  29. Comparison Of Payments @ 375/ton Peanuts *Additional peanuts
  30. Whole Farm Comparison of House and Senate Proposals
  31. Field And Resource Management Cost Accounting Tracking System
  32. A tool to help producers track and organize real time cost, track and organize production data, including pesticide and water usage determine total costs, compare the performances of individual fields and the whole farm operation with break-even analysis, aid in management decisions in a user-friendly format Overall, an effort to enhance the COMPETITIVENESS of US peanut producers.
  33. We Need Your Help Cost of Production Survey for Southeast Target Sample Size – 700 from GA,FL,AL Representative Farms 7 in Georgia 2 Alabama 2 Florida 1 South Carolina
  34. UGA Peanut Team www.ugapeanuts.com