Slide Presentation

TITLE    (click title to view slides)

AUTHOR
Stanley Culpepper, Keith Rucker, Tim Flanders
University of Georgia

DOWNLOAD
• Slide Presentation (PowerPoint, 856 KB)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
  1. Pepper Response to Sandea
  2. Objective
  3. Treatments Under Plastic
  4. Treatments Over-the-Top and Directed
  5. Application Information
  6. Pepper Response to Sandea Applied Postemergence. 14 DAT
  7. Sandea vs Non-treated
  8. Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied POST to Pepper. Jumbo - Harvest 1 & 2
  9. Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied POST to Pepper. Jumbo - Harvest 3
  10. Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied POST to Pepper. Jumbo - Total Harvest
  11. Pepper Response
  12. Pepper Response to Sandea Applied Under Plastic. 6 WAP, 8 WAT
  13. Non-treated vs Sandea (0.5 oz/A)
  14. Non-treated vs Sandea (1.0 oz/A)
  15. Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied Under Plastic. Jumbo - Harvest 1 & 2
  16. Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied Under Plastic. Jumbo - Harvest 3
  17. Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied Under Plastic. Jumbo - Total Yield
  18. Conclusions



SLIDE CONTENTS
  1. Pepper Response to Sandea A. Stanley Culpepper Keith Rucker And Tim Flanders The University of Georgia
  2. OBJECTIVE Determine pepper tolerance to Sandea applied precision-directed, topical, or under plastic.
  3. Treatments Under plastic 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 ounces Sandea per Acre 4 replications per treatment * All Treatments Contained 0.25% NIS by Volume
  4. Treatments Over-the-Top and Directed 0.5 ounces Sandea per Acre 4 replications per treatment * All Treatments Contained 0.25% NIS by Volume
  5. Application Information Plots = 6 ft. by 15 ft. 20 or 14.8 GPA spray solution Directed treatments precision applied to lower 25% of plant canopy Injury ratings measured Three harvest dates
  6. % injury Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001. a b Pepper Response to Sandea Applied Postemergence. 14 DAT.
  7. Sandea (0.5 oz/A) topical Non-treated
  8. box/A Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001. a b Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied POST to Pepper. Jumbo - Harvest 1 & 2. a b
  9. box/A Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001. a b Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied POST to Pepper. Jumbo - Harvest 3. b ab
  10. box/A Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001. a b Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied POST to Pepper. Jumbo - Total Harvest. ab b
  11. Pepper Response to Sandea Applied Under Plastic. 6 WAP, 8 WAT. % injury Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001. a ab b
  12. Non-treated Sandea (0.5 oz/A) applied under plastic
  13. Non-treated Sandea (1.0 oz/A) applied under plastic
  14. Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied Under Plastic. Jumbo - Harvest 1 & 2. box/A Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001. a a a b
  15. Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied Under Plastic. Jumbo - Harvest 3. box/A Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001. a a a b ab b a
  16. Pepper Yields with Sandea Applied Under Plastic. Jumbo - Total Yield. box/A Lewis Taylor Farms, Tifton, 2001.
  17. Conclusions Pepper tolerance to topical Sandea applications is unacceptable. Directed applications most likely unacceptable. Additional research focusing on Sandea under plastic is needed but tolerance and nutsedge control is questionable.